Graduating from one of the top three -- Seoul National University, Yonsei and Korea University -- means social status and better job and even marriage prospects [wow, all that schooling and studying and homework to score a husband and live life as a wife at home washing vegetables all day]! Conditioning begins early.
University entrance exams include testing English aptitude. Enter my point: Teaching English is Big Business in Korea. English is taught as a required subject in regular school. However, since Korean-taught English classes usually focus on English language proficiency tests such as TOEIC and TOEFL, which tend to be listening and grammar-based, with little or no emphasis on spoken English, many Koreans have very limited speaking ability in English. This is why conversational English with a native English speaker is an easy service to sell here.
This is also why you can be hired from across the globe to come to Korea based solely on the fact that you speak English natively. But conversational English 'teaching' jobs represent only about 10% of the English teaching jobs available in Korea [a factoid I created based on several months of job searching using a half a dozen online job boards]. The rest of the lot is serious English language instruction (e.g. phonetics, grammar, syntax, etc.), which is sold by hagwons to Daechidong Moms that want their kids (who are already getting this type of instruction at their regular school) to have refresher English instruction. So never mind the fact that you don't have teaching degrees, prior teaching experiences, professional certifications or qualifications or educational training b/c if you are a native English speaker then you are naturally qualified to teach English, right? Wrong. I'm living breathing evidence to the contrary. To speak English natively is not enough to offer English language instruction.
I'm still writing about this now b/c I often wonder how so many others like me have managed to teach English despite my belief that hiring based on English speech alone is either a brilliant or flawed business strategy that leaves Daechidong Moms broke, Hagwon directors rich, Korean students exhausted and no better prepared for entrance exams and English teachers well paid. I mean, how much would you pay for your child to play hangman with an English speaker?
Of my two days teaching English to preschoolers in Korea, I have this to say: it takes a special person to be a good teacher and I have a WHOLE new respect for the job.
1 comment:
Great entry, Sue. I did a research project about Japanese "cram" schools in college. I first heard about these schools as a junior and I was absolutely shocked to hear that that was life as usual on that side of the world. At work we accept new students on a weekly basis. it's very common for Japanese and Korean students to test 2-4 levels higher than they actually are. Speaking skills are quite often WAY lower than test-taking skills. It's a very, very interesting phenomenon. I really wonder how much longer these "daechidong" moms (and the who culture) will believe that these cram sessions are good practices for their little children. It really seems cruel to me!
Post a Comment